To evaluate whether or not the mathematics nervousness-results link was moderated by the a selection of parameters (age

g., geographical area, dimension away from MA, dimensions out-of mathematics abilities, gender, level peak, and you can book season), i held the brand new heterogeneity take to. The latest Q test (heterogeneity attempt) have discovered the differences one of perception brands, hence to explore and this prospective moderator (i.e., investigation has) have starred a job throughout these variations is requisite.

Geographic Part

Geographic nations was felt a prospective average foundation. The result items was basically grouped on the four large groups: All of us, Europe, Asia or any other counties. New mathematical heterogeneity among the perception models is shown (Q = , p = 0.01). Particularly, the studies with Asian examples had the prominent perception proportions (r = ?0.41), because the education that have Western european trials shown the tiniest impact proportions (roentgen = ?0.21). At the same time, the studies with us trials had a more impressive impact proportions (r = ?0.30) as compared to involved group from inside the Europe, while they got a smaller impression dimensions than the corresponding group inside China.

Sex

This new average analyses on the intercourse was presented as a result of two actions. First, the course about this varying is in keeping with Ma’s (1999) study, therefore opposed perhaps the mathematics nervousness-overall performance connect is actually somewhat other certainly one of about three classes (men, women, and you can mixed); the outcome ideal there were zero distinctions among the about three groups (Q = 4.62, p = 0.099). 2nd, this research had a tendency to offer after that to check when you should exclude the new confound feeling from the mixed class and you can perhaps the average correlations anywhere between male and female was indeed notably additional. Just eight training that provided this new relationship anywhere between MA and you will mathematics overall performance or vital information will be gone to live in impression versions for different men and women was indeed provided. The outcome ideal zero significant difference anywhere between lady (r = ?0.30) and men (r = ?0.18) (Q = dos.73, p = 0.098).

Grade Level

Five level-top teams was indeed designed contained in this meta-investigation, plus a standard classification, junior large group, older large group, mix category, and you may college or university classification. The outcome ideal it variable got high outcomes into the mathematics anxiety-show link (Q = , p = 0.02). More specifically, the brand new senior large classification met with the premier mathematics anxiety-efficiency hook (roentgen = ?0.44), with the brand new junior high class (r = ?0.39), college (r = ?0.33), primary (r = ?0.27), and you will mixed category, which had the tiniest math anxiety-performance hook (r = ?0.21).

Guide Many years

The present day meta-analysis contains the amount of time physique away from 19 many years (2000–2018). To evaluate whether date got an impact on the fresh math anxiety-efficiency link, an excellent Pearson correlation are conducted within book years together with of all the private knowledge (r = 0.twenty-seven, p > 0.05). Zero correlation is receive anywhere between effect designs together with guide age ( Shape 4 ).

Measurement from MA

I together with searched if the scales familiar with shot math anxiety had an effect on the fresh new mathematics anxiety-results connect. The outcomes advised the aspect off MA didn’t come with impact toward math stress-results hook up (Q = six.54, p = 0.48). Particularly, individual training that used almost every other bills (elizabeth.g., this new Math Stress Measure to have Primary School College students [MASESS; Bindak, 2005] met with the premier math anxiety-abilities link (r = ?0.41), followed by knowledge which used the MAS (roentgen = ?0.40), MARS (r = ?0.35), MAQ (r = ?0.28), MASYC (r = ?0.26), CMAQ (roentgen = ?0.24), SEMA (r = ?0.24), and AMAS (r = ?0.24), and you may personal training which used new MASC had the tiniest mathematics anxiety-overall performance link (r = ?0.15).

Aspect out of Mathematics Results

The classification criteria used to code the “math performance” variable are different. In terms leer aquí of the testing aspects of the math performance test, two skills were highlighted: calculation and problem solving. In this study, the measurement aspects of the test had significant effects on the math anxiety-performance link (Q = , p < 0.01). Studies that evaluated mixed math performance (calculation and problem solving) reported the largest effects (r = ?0.37). In addition, it is worth noting that studies in which the test assessed problem-solving skills in math performance reported larger effects (r = ?0.33), while studies that assessed the calculation ability in math performance reported smaller effects (r = ?0.21). In terms of the form of the math performance test, three types of math performance tests were identified: custom test, standardized test and others. There was a significant difference among these conditions (Q = , p = 0.001). The results suggested that studies that adopted a standardized test custom test reported larger effects (r = ?0.33) than studies that adopted a standardized test (r = ?0.28). Moreover, the studies that adopted other math tests reported the largest effects (r = ?0.51).